# Architectural Decisions Log ## 2025-02-17 - Enhanced Mode State Management Architecture ### Context The current mode management system provides basic functionality for toggling between Plan and Act modes with simple state persistence. However, as the system grows, we need a more robust and feature-rich mode management system that can handle complex state management, mode-specific behaviors, and better integration with other components. ### Decision Implement an enhanced mode state management system with the following key components: 1. **Advanced State Management** - Implement mode-specific settings store - Add context preservation between mode switches - Create mode initialization hooks - Add state validation and recovery mechanisms 2. **Event System** - Implement pre/post mode change hooks - Add event queueing system - Create mode-specific event handlers - Support async event processing 3. **Persistence Layer** - Enhanced state file format with versioning - State migration system - Corruption detection and recovery - Mode-specific context preservation 4. **Integration System** - Mode-aware plugin architecture - LSP integration with mode context - Buffer and window layout persistence - Mode-specific UI elements ### Rationale - Current system lacks robust state management - Need better integration with other components - Require more sophisticated event handling - Want to support mode-specific behaviors - Need better error handling and recovery - Desire for mode-specific UI/UX customization ### Implementation 1. Phase 1: Core State Management - Enhance state persistence - Add validation system - Implement context preservation 2. Phase 2: Event System - Add event hooks - Implement queueing - Create handlers 3. Phase 3: Persistence Layer - Update state format - Add versioning - Implement migration 4. Phase 4: Integration - Plugin integration - LSP integration - UI integration ### Consequences **Positive:** - More robust state management - Better error handling - Enhanced user experience - More flexible configuration - Better integration capabilities **Negative:** - Increased complexity - More maintenance overhead - Larger codebase - More potential failure points ### Status - Decision approved - Implementation planning in progress - Initial architecture documented - Ready for code mode implementation