82 lines
2.4 KiB
Markdown
82 lines
2.4 KiB
Markdown
# Architectural Decisions Log
|
|
|
|
## 2025-02-17 - Enhanced Mode State Management Architecture
|
|
|
|
### Context
|
|
The current mode management system provides basic functionality for toggling between Plan and Act modes with simple state persistence. However, as the system grows, we need a more robust and feature-rich mode management system that can handle complex state management, mode-specific behaviors, and better integration with other components.
|
|
|
|
### Decision
|
|
Implement an enhanced mode state management system with the following key components:
|
|
|
|
1. **Advanced State Management**
|
|
- Implement mode-specific settings store
|
|
- Add context preservation between mode switches
|
|
- Create mode initialization hooks
|
|
- Add state validation and recovery mechanisms
|
|
|
|
2. **Event System**
|
|
- Implement pre/post mode change hooks
|
|
- Add event queueing system
|
|
- Create mode-specific event handlers
|
|
- Support async event processing
|
|
|
|
3. **Persistence Layer**
|
|
- Enhanced state file format with versioning
|
|
- State migration system
|
|
- Corruption detection and recovery
|
|
- Mode-specific context preservation
|
|
|
|
4. **Integration System**
|
|
- Mode-aware plugin architecture
|
|
- LSP integration with mode context
|
|
- Buffer and window layout persistence
|
|
- Mode-specific UI elements
|
|
|
|
### Rationale
|
|
- Current system lacks robust state management
|
|
- Need better integration with other components
|
|
- Require more sophisticated event handling
|
|
- Want to support mode-specific behaviors
|
|
- Need better error handling and recovery
|
|
- Desire for mode-specific UI/UX customization
|
|
|
|
### Implementation
|
|
1. Phase 1: Core State Management
|
|
- Enhance state persistence
|
|
- Add validation system
|
|
- Implement context preservation
|
|
|
|
2. Phase 2: Event System
|
|
- Add event hooks
|
|
- Implement queueing
|
|
- Create handlers
|
|
|
|
3. Phase 3: Persistence Layer
|
|
- Update state format
|
|
- Add versioning
|
|
- Implement migration
|
|
|
|
4. Phase 4: Integration
|
|
- Plugin integration
|
|
- LSP integration
|
|
- UI integration
|
|
|
|
### Consequences
|
|
**Positive:**
|
|
- More robust state management
|
|
- Better error handling
|
|
- Enhanced user experience
|
|
- More flexible configuration
|
|
- Better integration capabilities
|
|
|
|
**Negative:**
|
|
- Increased complexity
|
|
- More maintenance overhead
|
|
- Larger codebase
|
|
- More potential failure points
|
|
|
|
### Status
|
|
- Decision approved
|
|
- Implementation planning in progress
|
|
- Initial architecture documented
|
|
- Ready for code mode implementation |